Two halves of the country religiously have their version of reality and both Biden and Trump feed their believers
The purported Biden-team strategy to build their 2024 election campaign on is to elevate ½-of-the-country’s reality that Donald trump supposedly was and is a cruel dictator and on January 6 2020 during the D.C. Capitol riot Trump allegedly was guilty of inciting a violent riot to install by coup a new government where Trump would have been president … even though he lost the presidential election.
- opened with conjuring up a setting (in people’s minds) where a direction of a so-called true democracy would be lodged in the minds … babbling about general George Washington in 1777 on a “mission of liberty not conquest and freedom not domination, the soul of the Nation”[sic] etc etc
- back in 1777 the U.S. wasn’t formed yet completely (thirteen colonies separation) and still under the reign of the king of England George III … anyway “America made a vow never again would we bow down to a King” Biden said, referring ominously to the ½ of the country’s idea that Donald Trump as president of the country would be tantamount to a King, if believable to the reader … meaning the might of a president is by far NOT limitless, Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, the whole machinery behind leaders can close doors for any president to make (abhorrent to ½ of the country) signatures of the president (executive orders for instance) ineffective, vapid when staff, policymakers, mayors, governors etc etc will do anything to thwart ideas of a president
- so the farcical idea Trump acting like a King should be asinine for anyone who saw what happened during Trump’s presidency jan ’17 – jan ’21 when the energy thwarting Trump’s directions became bigger and bigger
President Biden visiting Valley Forge -the encampment site of the Continental Army during the winter of 1777-1778
- Biden said (min 25:01) “Today we gather in a new year some 256 years later just one day before January 6, a day for ever shared in our memory because it was on that day we nearly lost America.”
- what is being done in this speech is gaslighting the public that January-6-protesters would have been able to throw out the sitting leaders of the country and start a coup by thwarting a peaceful transition of power … this idea is ridiculous in the 21th century
- Biden asked the question “Is democracy still America’s sacred cause?” which prompts the question what the noun Democracy means. Is what people experience the definition of the dictionary “a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections?”
- Does the citizenry experience guidance and policies executed by their government representing their directions?
- Which citizenry percentage concurs with:
- Ukraine spending tallying up to more than $70 billion
- open (southern) border policies
- Ukraine war was provoked and prolonged by U.S. in lieu of having had the explicit opportunity to smother the Ukraine war very early on via peace talks
- overspending and via installments of more (FED)loans spurring inflation and therefore making daily life more expensive
- four minutes into his speech Biden described what happened during the Jan 6 Capitol riot in a way the democratic House majority at the time carefully planned what information to release and what NOT to release. The narrative isn’t the amalgamation of facts but an amalgamation of facts, half truths and labelling in a way hostile to a general truth, loose of democratic or republic dispositions
Biden is in the position to state to be the sentinel of truth if you will, and for ½ the country that will be acceptable.
But the other half is left behind, never served by the media to investigate matters that might make Biden skate on thin ice; Biden claimed Trump lost the election, lost 60 court cases and lost recounts in various states.
That is observed as truth, albeit knowing that ½ the country (thus including state and federal officials, workers and media etc.) would be very much inclined to do whatever has to be done to create an outcome that would make Biden win the election … even though the man drew and draws no crowds, was at the time not leaving the house (Covid policy), cannot speak interestingly (therefore no crowds) and can be observed as a brittle and quickly lost (his way).
Can one conclude any case in general that this or that did or did not happen when the investigators are not willing to investigate sections of facts that might be favorable to the opposing team? In the January 6 investigations it seems obvious to half the country that torch lights were deliberately not shone on all parts of arrays of facts.
Looking in to the abyss of enormous data which seems impossible for one person to fully study and comprehend, thus make a logical conclusion serving justice to what happened to the full extent … and what not, both on January 6 2021, but also in the weeks/months prior, building more and more rungs onto an escalation ladder where the media partook a major role in.
By just reasoning our way out of the conundrum of “who is right … Biden-team or Trump-team?” seems an impossible task; the fluidity sustenance seems bigger than people think. When listening to arguments emanating from both sides, a black or white verdict seems shrouded in bias.