And yes those answers might be opaque to understand too ... but still
This post is about the Covid-19 facts outside of the news reels in the media reporting on health organizations, pharmaceutical companies, politics and every other edifice put into a cauldron making a fist against pandemics and creating vaccines to keep people more strong against viruses.
Putting the last sentence in italics is because what people might have concluded is the opposite of that.
Whether Brett Weinstein, Denis Rancourt or other professionally engaged scientists giving luckily nothing about a consequentialist-truth-narrative, but only trying to find a deontological scientific truth and knowingly find closed doors, toil and untruths being lunged at them they continue without the spotlight and 15-min fame.
The official scientific Covid-19 pandemic narrative where scientist mostly were usurped and thus navigated by politics is a bad thing.
Is the World Health Organization there only for the benevolence of the people … or are there many ways this institution operates and the very wide moat of information is not being looked at by the main stream media?
These three videos will capture some of what is not reported.
Ep. 60 Is the lesson of the Covid disaster that we should give its architects more power? Bret Weinstein on the WHO’s plans for you. pic.twitter.com/ku3O5BdeoF
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 5, 2024
👉 @BretWeinstein tells @TuckerCarlson he saw "a credible estimate of 17 million deaths" at a conference in Romania
— Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt) January 6, 2024
THIS WAS THAT PRESENTATION IN ROMANIA (18 November 2023, Bucharest Parliament building): https://t.co/6Obe2GDmHW pic.twitter.com/T2ZAOzLgC2
This video is where Bret Weinstein describes the daunting ideas what might occur in the body after taking an mrna covid shot (the weight of the issue starts at 10:28 until 17:35).
Short version is that the lipid particles are traveling to other organs whereas Covid information disseminated otherwise.
Read the next paragraph the explanation of the natural immune system laid out by Bret Weinstein as an evolutionary biologist. Yes not as an epidemiologist or a virologist.
The video on the right is where chair of the board Denis Rancourt of the CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest holds a lecture in the Romanian Parliament on November 2023 about the Covid-19 pandemic … which according to data obtained during the Covid spike years wasn’t a pandemic to begin with.
The thread of the lecture is (paraphrased) that in non-western countries the mortality spikes were different (mostly lower) than western countries. Within western countries the poor were much more dying than rich(er) peoples. Also, young people were incorporated in the death stats if corrected for ‘only percentage-wise’ in lieu of total deaths more then the elderly,
The natural immune system according to Weinstein works as follows.
When a person gets sick and cells got infected it starts copying the infected cells. The body’s response of recognizing an endogenous cell producing an antigen (foreign protein) that it doesn’t recognize it assumes its virally infected and to attack it.
Mrna-technology does exactly this, it unleashes a foreign protein and annihilation occurs. Locally (arm) isn’t bad, but when lungs or the heart is reached by traveling mrna-protein and it’s (of course) attacked by the immune system the heart can be damaged and the worst part of it is … the heart lacks self-healing capacity. A wound occurs when tissue is attacked and if one is very unlucky, the wound might cause blood leakage enough to go to hospital, if luckier one survives the wound it over time it scars which might lead to effect heart rhythm, the capacity to transport o2 and co2 to the body and more to effect negatively one’s lifespan.
What is devastating is that one doesn’t feel a wounded scarred heart, thus people might go about their lives for X-number of years before a medical situation mandates potentially a life-threatening moment on one’s future timeline.
Aspirating and only inject a Covid-19 needle in the muscle is paramount; the person giving the shot has a way to check whether the tip of the needle went into a blood vessel or any type of conduit to transport the given vaccine via a major thoroughfare right to other organs. This proces is called aspiration. But of course, political tendrils of health organizations are making aspiration ambiguous and try to avoid hesitancy with the patient.
Pushing the heart to its limits (what athletes, football- and soccer players do etc.), the fast pumping of the heart might push a heart wound or not fully scarred-over heart wound to fatal outcomes.
Benevolent or malignant
Whether one thinks the level of science discussed and disseminated on big television networks and newspapers is only and merely benevolent for the people and only benevolent intentions are driving political and scientific advancement … or one thinks it’s a mix of benevolence and malignancy where even the part of malignancy is not perceived as such by the politicians/scientists.
Why the last sentence ameliorating the politicians/scientists intententions? Well there is, alas, such a thing as where two well-intentioned people with both well-intentioned different perceiving structures in their minds what would be beneficial to a city, a state, province, country or the world.
Watch the Dr. John Campbell video below with James Roguski whom I didn’t know up until today, but claiming he tries to disseminate and break through “lies and propaganda” according to his Substack.
Why sharing this video here seems relevant because Mr. Roguski shares an insight about ‘the elites‘ from a more insightful perspective than the dumb idea ‘the elites want such and such.’ even though I didn’t know his credentials is in this video he talked about Covid-19 policies.
Try it for five minutes and Roguski has explained this different perspective quite insightful.